It's Wednesday, and that means a look at the out-of-town Q&A.
Today's guest is Bill Cole, a long-time writer for the Winston-Salem Journal. Bill was gracious enough to lend his insight on Duke (1-3), which will visit Maryland (3-1) on Saturday.
(He's his latest on the Blue Devils).
Let's get to the look inside the Blue Devils. ...
1. Duke is giving up 44.5 points and 466.3 yards a game after the first month of the season. Do the Blue Devils have a chance to look competent on that side of the ball, or is a series of high-scoring affairs their best chance to succeed this year?
BC: The defense is going to have to improve drastically to keep every game from becoming a shootout. Duke has more speed on defense this season because of Coach David Cutcliffe’s recruiting, but it hasn’t been able to mask weaknesses and shortcomings as Cutcliffe thought it would. A lack of playmakers the likes of Michael Tauiliili and Vincent Rey, who were tackling machines at linebacker, has hurt also.
2. Was Saturday a serious setback in quarterback Sean Renfree's development, or is it being viewed as merely the sort of hiccup a first-year starter might encounter?
BC: It appears to be an exception. Cutcliffe said that Army confused Renfree by changing its defensive coverage, leading to two interceptions in his first five passes. The start was only Renfree’s fourth at Duke, so he is still learning. Renfree was disturbed when looking at the game video and said he hardly recognized the player wearing his jersey because of body language. He was more concerned with his attitude on the field in the game and how he responded to the interceptions. He’s going to be a good quarterback, so I tend to write off last Saturday as a bad day.
3. Duke's running game was feeble at best a season ago. Is the improvement this year a product of Desmond Scott or an improved offensive line (or both) and does it seem like the rushing attack can remain capable deep into ACC play?
BC: Duke has two good young backs: Desmond Scott, the starter at tailback, and Josh Snead, the top reserve. Both run hard, especially Snead. It appears that Duke can keep running the ball all season because the offensive line has improved also. Both elements are much better than in past seasons.
4. Conner Vernon emerged as the top receiver in the ACC during September. Has he displaced Donovan Varner as Duke's No. 1 wideout, or is his production more reflective of extra attention Varner has attracted this year?
BC: Yes and no. Teams are paying attention to Varner, but Renfree seems more comfortable throwing to Vernon. (This is like the scene out of Airplane: Victor, what’s your vector?). Renfree promises to keep distributing the ball to all receivers, but it does seem that he considers Vernon his go-to guy. He constantly looked for Vernon in the Army game. Varner was not a big factor in the passing game then.
5. Duke made progress during David Cutcliffe's first two seasons, but matching last year's 5-7 mark seems highly unlikely after a 1-3 start. Has attention already started to dwindle in Durham, and do the Blue Devils have much of a chance to salvage their season if they can't win at Maryland on Saturday?
BC: Attendance dropped about 12,000 from the Alabama game to the Army game, but that’s somewhat understandable, given the Alabama football devotion. By the third quarter of the Army game, fans were leaving with the score 28-7. Interest is still higher than in the past, but it will disappear with each loss. I don’t see much of a chance for Duke to have a winning season now, unless an upset of Maryland sparks a run. Duke still has games against Miami, Virginia Tech, Georgia Tech and UNC left. Right now, there are no games there that you can look at and say that Duke would be favored to win.
Thanks again to Bill Cole for taking time to share his knowledge of Duke football.
Recent Comments